yukey

describe current 'i'nfo hotkey norm.

commit 14d48af967bae08d8ff1a18cf9312b9c10f715f5 · parent b199b7be64 · browse this tree
warpfork, 2026-10-10 02:42:37 UTC

I changed it to say '?' while extricating the docs, but...
in the interest of more graceful extrication of the matching code,
let's not change the docs until we also change the code.

also tbqf i'm just fond of i-for-info.
I'm still trying to accept the question mark in my heart.

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 3e3d5af..48fb76d 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Some details to notice here:
 - Activation is distinct from focus.  You can always shift the focus; whether to activate an element after that is a separate choice.
 
 Other features are harder to show in a single screenshot.
-For example, pressing "?" at any point will show more info about
+For example, pressing "`i`" at any point will show more info about
 any focused element.
 (It's like tooltips, but without needing a mouse!)
 
diff --git a/docs/precepts-we-love-the-keyboard.md b/docs/precepts-we-love-the-keyboard.md
index 0bf5d26..2ae3205 100644
--- a/docs/precepts-we-love-the-keyboard.md
+++ b/docs/precepts-we-love-the-keyboard.md
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ specifically to counter the "mouse has tooltips, keyboard has whoops" problem:
 
 On almost any element that's activatable,
 and also many that are purely informative:
-the hotkey `?` means "info, please",
+the hotkey `i` means "info, please",
 and does something similar to raising up a tooltip.
 
 #### what goes in info pops?